Post
Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
09Nov
2010
Out with the old, in with the new???
ECI Staff

The decision-making process regarding if/when to make the full transition from SDH/SONET to MPLS reminds me of the dilemma I face as I weigh upgrading from Windows XP to Windows 7. It’s a classic battle between old and new.

 
You see, Windows XP is good and reliable, and I’ve been using it for a while. Its features and capabilities are suitable to my current needs. But… it is lacking some of the new features found in Windows 7 and it’s possible that compatibility issues with new programs and applications could occur. So should I keep this old standby or make the transition to the newer Windows technology?
 
Well, I think there are two main considerations in play here, familiarity and innovation. Let’s take a closer look at each.
 
Familiarity – My old operating system, much like SDH/SONET, is extremely reliable. I’m very familiar with its features, and I know its operational aspects by heart. Meanwhile, Windows 7 technology would be entirely new to me and there would be a learning curve (as there would with MPLS).
 
Innovation – Although I don’t currently have a touch-screen monitor, I would like to take advantage of the new touch functionality someday. And even though I’m not currently utilizing Windows Media Player to stream media files from one computer to another or across the Internet, I would like to do so at some point. Problem is, Windows XP doesn’t support either of these things. This same scenario can be applied to moving to MPLS. In many cases, the current SDH/SONET network doesn’t have enough capacity to support Ethernet traffic, but at the same time operators would like to be prepared for it.
 
Moving to a new operating system requires money and time, and I’m not sure that upgrading to something new when everything is working fine makes sense. The same is true when considering a move to MPLS. In some cases, Ethernet services can be supported over SDH/SONET by upgrading to a hybrid version or adding an external device. This can move out the decision to a time that’s more suitable financially or when the need for more bandwidth becomes a pressing issue.
 

 

Oh well, I suppose that I’ll eventually have to upgrade…but I’ll do it when the cost-benefit analysis tells me the time is right.
 
Orly Nahum
Head of Product Marketing
ECI Telecom​
4 comments
  • image description
    Mac
    13 Jun 2011 at 5:23 PM

    I don’t think it’s fair to compare MPLS with SDH/SONET. Remember, we can have Ethernet/MPLS over SDH. Also, we need to consider the layer/level we are operating at.

    My 2 cents.
    Mac

  • image description
    Orly
    13 Jun 2011 at 5:23 PM

    Mac,
    Thank you for your comment. I believe the fact that we can deliver Ethernet/MPLS over SDH reinforces my point of view that there are many cases where we do not need to replace the old with the new and, in some instances, what we have (SDH) can support our needs (packet traffic) and the additional capacity and capabilities are not needed (or at least not now).

    Orly

  • image description
    Vladimir
    13 Jun 2011 at 5:24 PM

    As someone who just migrated from xp through vista to 7, I must say on both vista and 7 I have been using VMWare with virtual XP, and I keep using it for all the specific services I know were working just fine on xp and I just want to leave them there (for example all ECI’s configuration software, LCT’s etc, vpn’s etc..
    So, putting it in IP/TDM perspective, I would say I would still leave TDM to do TDM job whenever possible and not to force it over IP, MPLS or carrier ethernet in any flavor, without a real need or a clear, per case business model.  My carrier ethernet MPLS platform (Win7) will take over it all eventually but only when I realize I haven’t started XP for few months…
    Vladimir

  • image description
    Ariel
    13 Jun 2011 at 5:25 PM

    Vladimir,
    ECI offers transition paths for each and every network evolution. With our all-native solutions, users can transport their TDM traffic natively, alongside data/Ethernet traffic. When data becomes the main traffic (volume wise), handling the traffic via our all-packet solutions makes more sense. We strongly advocate a gradual transition — one which is done according to the network’s traffic blend.

    Ariel Caner

leave a comment
 
   
Verification Code