ECI's Elastic Network
  • Career
  • Follow
    • Blog
  • Login
ECI ELASTIC Network solutions logo
  • Career
  • Follow
    • Blog
  • Login
ECI-BLOG-1.jpg
ECI-BLOG-Page.jpg

The Future of Networks: Intent?

Posted by Russ White on 6 Aug 2018
Russ White
  • Tweet

Or What Does Intent Based Networking Actually Mean?

For this final post on the transformation of networking, it is time to get intentional. Or perhaps, to get down to the intent. Or something like that. There has been a lot of discussion about intent based networking in the last several years; what is the hype about, and how will it effect the future of network design and operations? A good place to begin is with some thoughts on the meaning of the word intent.

Intent could mean the intention of the business leadership. For instance, “the network needs to be able to support five nines of availability,” or “the network needs to support this new application we have just purchased and intend to deploy in the next two weeks.” This type of intent does not seem to be the aim of intent based networking, however. Each of these intents are too broad to be useful to any kind of automated system towards reconfiguring a network to operate in a more optimal way. Moving from the intent of the business to the intent of the designer, we face the same sort of problem. How might a network reconfigure itself to support a new site, or replace the networking devices in a campus? Any time there is the deployment of new physical hardware involved, it seems unlikely that intent based networking will be able to do much more than indicate (unless you assume that a router manufacturing printer will be attached to the network at some point in the future, so the network can literally be self-deploying and self-healing!).

To Learn More About Our Intent Based Networking Solutions,  Download Our Brochure

Where intent comes into play, it seems, is in reducing the complexity of the configuration at an operational level. For instance, assume an operator wants to prioritize the traffic for one application above some other application. There are a number of ways to solve this problem, of course; in an intent based system, it is not up to the operator to decide which technology to use. Assume the intent based system is programmed to split this kind of problem into three parts, with one part distributing a set of filters to distinguish the traffic; a second part configuring the edge routers to mark the traffic so it is placed in a specific queue; and a third part configuring the queues throughout the network so the traffic is handled properly. The intent based system is programmed to use signaling in BGP to solve the first two parts, and to connect to each device in the network to configure the QoS settings for the third.

Thus, intent serves only to remove the manual configuration; the intent of the business must be interpreted into design intent, and then design intent into a set of fairly specific requirements; only then can the system accept the intent and take action on it. This raises several areas of caution in the area of intent based systems.

First, how will the intent be expressed? Will it be any different than any other vendor-specific language or configuration system? Will the “intent language” become a specialized, deeply technical language in which expressing an intent to one system will end up meaning something completely different to another system?

This points to the second problem, which is the concept of intent, as described above, is a form of abstraction. Anyone who has followed my writing knows I am very cautious in the face of deep abstractions. While abstractions are necessary to build a system to scale, they are also the source of many problems. For instance, in the example above, quality of service is abstracted into an intent by the network operator. As noted above, however, the application of the intent may require precise wording on the part of the operator to ensure the correct result in the operation of the network—in other words, the underlying mechanisms will likely leak through the abstraction of intent into the way the operator interacts with the system. This should not be surprising, as all nontrivial abstractions leak.

Third, as an abstraction, intent based systems must remove some kind of information—and the removal of information in the control plane (specifically) always relates to some form of suboptimal use of resources in the network. While computer networks seem to be overengineered, with plenty of capacity to waste now, the brutal realities of economics will eventually dictate that networks become more efficient in their use of resources. In this case, the intent based model may become difficult to sustain.

The bottom line is this: intent based network represents a set of tradeoffs like any other technology. Intent based systems will be useful in some situations, and not useful in others. Along the way, intent based systems may add complexity, or even (if done correctly) remove complexity. Intent based systems may well help revolutionize the concepts of network design and operation—but they are not likely to mark the end of network engineering.

To Learn More About Our Intent Based Networking Solutions,  Download Our Brochure

Topics: SDN, Service Providers, 5G, Software Defined Networks, Intent-based Networking

Subscribe to ECI Email Updates

aboutheauthor-new
Russ White
Russ White

Russ White has more than twenty years' experience in designing, deploying, breaking, and troubleshooting large scale networks. Russ is currently a member of the Architecture Team at LinkedIn, where he works on next generation data center designs, complexity, and security. His most recent books are The Art of Network Architecture and Navigating Network Complexity.

ECI For Network Solutions
brows-categories-new

  • 5G (70)
  • Service Providers (63)
  • SDN (58)
  • Optical Networking (56)
  • Critical Infrastructures (38)
  • NFV (36)
  • Cyber Security (33)
  • Utility (27)
  • Packet Networking (26)
  • Network Modernization (24)
  • Mobile Backhaul (20)
  • IP (18)
  • Network Slicing (18)
  • Optical Networks (18)
  • Cloud Networking (13)
  • Enhancing Network Efficiency (13)
  • Other (12)
  • Packet (12)
  • Telco Transformation (12)
  • Carrier Ethernet (11)
  • IoT (10)
  • Software (10)
  • Utilities (10)
  • eMBB (10)
  • Africa (9)
  • Legacy Networks (9)
  • SD-WAN (9)
  • DWDM (8)
  • MMTC (8)
  • Multi-Layer Optimization (8)
  • Network Management (8)
  • Packet Networks (8)
  • Smart City (8)
  • URLLC (8)
  • containers (8)
  • telecom (8)
  • FTTH (7)
  • IP Networks (7)
  • Open Source (7)
  • Segment Routing (7)
  • Disaggregation (6)
  • IETF (6)
  • IP/MPLS (6)
  • MPLS (6)
  • Network Transformation (6)
  • Open (6)
  • Profitability (6)
  • Services (6)
  • Smart Grid (6)
  • UTelco (6)
  • Wholesale Providers (6)
  • AR/VR (5)
  • Aligning Network Architectures (5)
  • Backhaul (5)
  • Digital Transformation (5)
  • FlexE (5)
  • Intelligent Networking (5)
  • Metro (5)
  • Networking (5)
  • OTN (5)
  • Software Defined Networks (5)
  • Sustainability (5)
  • VMs (5)
  • general (5)
  • 5G transport (4)
  • Access (4)
  • Carrier of Carriers (4)
  • FlexibleEthernet (4)
  • Hardware (4)
  • MEC (4)
  • Network Operations (4)
  • OTT (4)
  • Orchestration (4)
  • PaaS (4)
  • Telecoms (4)
  • Virtualization (4)
  • 5G business case (3)
  • 5G evolution (3)
  • 5G spectrum (3)
  • APIs (3)
  • Artificial Intelligence (3)
  • Autonomous Vehicles (3)
  • Cloud Design (3)
  • Connectivity (3)
  • DER (3)
  • Drones (3)
  • Environment (3)
  • Ethernet (3)
  • Hard slicing (3)
  • ICT (3)
  • IP Networking (3)
  • IPoverDWDM (3)
  • India (3)
  • Logical Network (3)
  • Maintenance Packages (3)
  • Multi-Tenant (3)
  • Network Automation (3)
  • Network Design (3)
  • Network Planning (3)
  • SLAs (3)
  • Soft slicing (3)
  • WAN (3)
  • WDM (3)
  • 5G Network Evolution (2)
  • 5G ROI (2)
  • 5G mobile transport (2)
  • 5G network slicing (2)
  • Airports (2)
  • Big-Data (2)
  • Broadcast (2)
  • Business Models (2)
  • Business Services (2)
  • CLI (2)
  • Data Center Interconnect (2)
  • DevOps (2)
  • Distributed Energy Resources (2)
  • Dockers (2)
  • Encryption (2)
  • Fiber Infrastructure (2)
  • Flex-Grid (2)
  • Global directory (2)
  • IP Technologies (2)
  • IaaS (2)
  • Infrastructure (2)
  • Interoperability (2)
  • Latency (2)
  • MEF (2)
  • MPLS-TP (2)
  • Machine Learning (2)
  • Mobile (2)
  • Multi-Access Edge Computing (2)
  • Multiplexer (2)
  • Municipalities (2)
  • NFVi (2)
  • Network Operating Systems (2)
  • OT Networks (2)
  • Open Optical Systems (2)
  • OpenFlow (2)
  • Optical Encryption (2)
  • Optical Transport Network (2)
  • PCE (2)
  • Packet-Optical (2)
  • RFC (2)
  • ROADM (2)
  • Railway (2)
  • SONET (2)
  • Security (2)
  • Shannon Limit (2)
  • Survey results (2)
  • TDM (2)
  • Telecommunications (2)
  • Transport (2)
  • Transportation (2)
  • Transportation infrastructures (2)
  • VIM (2)
  • VNFs (2)
  • VPN (2)
  • Wavelength (2)
  • hyperscale (2)
  • microservices (2)
  • network troubleshooting (2)
  • uCPE (2)
  • vCPE (2)
  • vRAN (2)
  • 5G NR (1)
  • 5G Network (1)
  • 5G Services (1)
  • 5G Slicing (1)
  • 5G roll out (1)
  • 5G technologies (1)
  • AI (1)
  • API economy (1)
  • ASON (1)
  • ATM (1)
  • AWS (1)
  • Active directory (1)
  • Army (1)
  • Bandwidth (1)
  • Bandwidth on Demand (1)
  • Bitcoin (1)
  • Blockchain (1)
  • Branch Office (1)
  • Business Care (1)
  • C4I (1)
  • CDC ROADM (1)
  • CLNS (1)
  • CMTC (1)
  • CPE (1)
  • Capacity (1)
  • Carriers (1)
  • Cloud Service Providers (1)
  • Coherent Technology (1)
  • Coherent Transport (1)
  • Colorless (1)
  • Complete Network Environment (1)
  • Connected Cars (1)
  • Contentionless (1)
  • Core (1)
  • Core Transport (1)
  • Critical Industries (1)
  • Dedicated ASIC (1)
  • Defense Forces (1)
  • Defense networks (1)
  • Digitizing Highways (1)
  • Directionless (1)
  • Directory systems (1)
  • Dynamic Service Provisioning (1)
  • ESP (1)
  • EV (1)
  • Electric Vehicles (1)
  • FDDI (1)
  • FTTP (1)
  • Fiber (1)
  • Fiber to the Premise (1)
  • Fibre (1)
  • Firewalls (1)
  • Fixed wireless access (1)
  • Fronthaul (1)
  • Future Proof (1)
  • God Box (1)
  • HLS (1)
  • Highways (1)
  • ICT Network (1)
  • IEEE (1)
  • IPv6 (1)
  • ISO (1)
  • IT (1)
  • India Mobile Congress (1)
  • Industry 4.0 (1)
  • Industry4.0 (1)
  • Intent-based Networking (1)
  • Internet (1)
  • Kubernetes (1)
  • LAN (1)
  • LATAM (1)
  • LTE (1)
  • Layer 1 (1)
  • Layer 1 Encryption (1)
  • Layer 2 (1)
  • Layer 3 (1)
  • Legacy Systems (1)
  • Legacy Technology Migration (1)
  • Lifecycle Management (1)
  • Local Area Network (1)
  • Low Latency (1)
  • MIME (1)
  • MNO (1)
  • MPLS-Based (1)
  • Massive Machine Type Communications (1)
  • Metro Aggregation (1)
  • Middleware (1)
  • Military (1)
  • Mobile Edge Computing (1)
  • Mobile Network Operator (1)
  • Mobile World Congress (1)
  • Modems (1)
  • NMS (1)
  • NOS (1)
  • Net Neutrality (1)
  • Network Centric Warfare (1)
  • Network Coverage (1)
  • Network Migration (1)
  • Network Security (1)
  • Network Upgrade (1)
  • Networks for defense forces (1)
  • Neutral host networks (1)
  • Non-coherent (1)
  • Novell Netware (1)
  • OLS (1)
  • OSI (1)
  • OSI Stack (1)
  • OSNR (1)
  • OTDR (1)
  • OTN transport and switching (1)
  • Oil and Gas (1)
  • Open Architectures (1)
  • Open Optics (1)
  • Openness (1)
  • Optical (1)
  • Optical Fiber (1)
  • Optical Fibre (1)
  • Optical Performance (1)
  • Optical Transmission (1)
  • Optimization (1)
  • Packet Migration (1)
  • Power (1)
  • Pricing (1)
  • RAN (1)
  • RESTful (1)
  • Real Time Gaming (1)
  • Redundancy (1)
  • Remote Surgery (1)
  • Research and Education (1)
  • Restoration (1)
  • Revenue Generating (1)
  • Roads (1)
  • Routing (1)
  • Rural Networks (1)
  • SCADA Anomaly Detection (1)
  • SDH (1)
  • STMP (1)
  • Securing the OT (1)
  • Self-Organizing Networks (1)
  • Smart Energy (1)
  • Smart Transportation (1)
  • Speed of Light (1)
  • Stateful (1)
  • Stateless (1)
  • Success (1)
  • TDM to Packet (1)
  • Telco Futurism (1)
  • Telecoms Business Model (1)
  • Token Ring (1)
  • Transformation (1)
  • Transportation Providers (1)
  • Transportation Systems (1)
  • URLL (1)
  • Utility Network (1)
  • Vendor Agnostic (1)
  • Water (1)
  • What-if simulations (1)
  • Whitebox (1)
  • Wireless (1)
  • X. 400 (1)
  • alien lambda (1)
  • alien wavelength (1)
  • channels (1)
  • continuous optimization (1)
  • e-learning (1)
  • eCPRI (1)
  • eVPN (1)
  • email directory (1)
  • enterprise (1)
  • fixed line access (1)
  • future technology (1)
  • healthcare (1)
  • homeland security agencies (1)
  • hyperconvergence (1)
  • lightPULSE (1)
  • mmWave (1)
  • network flexibility (1)
  • oRan (1)
  • programmable optics (1)
  • urbanization (1)
  • xHAL (1)
see all
archive-new

  • November 2019 (7)
  • October 2019 (7)
  • September 2019 (8)
  • August 2019 (4)
  • July 2019 (8)
  • June 2019 (6)
  • May 2019 (7)
  • April 2019 (8)
  • March 2019 (6)
  • February 2019 (7)
  • January 2019 (7)
  • December 2018 (3)
  • November 2018 (8)
  • October 2018 (8)
  • September 2018 (6)
  • August 2018 (4)
  • July 2018 (8)
  • June 2018 (7)
  • May 2018 (8)
  • April 2018 (8)
  • March 2018 (8)
  • February 2018 (7)
  • January 2018 (6)
  • December 2017 (4)
  • November 2017 (7)
  • October 2017 (8)
  • September 2017 (7)
  • August 2017 (4)
  • July 2017 (8)
  • June 2017 (8)
  • May 2017 (8)
  • April 2017 (6)
  • March 2017 (7)
  • February 2017 (7)
  • January 2017 (5)
  • December 2016 (3)
  • November 2016 (7)
  • October 2016 (5)
  • September 2016 (5)
  • August 2016 (6)
  • July 2016 (6)
  • June 2016 (6)
  • May 2016 (7)
  • April 2016 (9)
  • March 2016 (8)
  • February 2016 (7)
  • January 2016 (5)
  • November 2015 (6)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (1)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • January 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (1)
  • October 2014 (1)
  • August 2014 (1)
  • July 2014 (1)
  • January 2014 (1)
  • December 2013 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • June 2012 (1)
  • May 2012 (2)
  • March 2012 (2)
  • February 2012 (3)
  • January 2012 (2)
  • December 2011 (2)
  • November 2011 (5)
  • October 2011 (4)
  • September 2011 (5)
  • April 2011 (5)
  • February 2011 (2)
  • January 2011 (4)
  • December 2010 (5)
  • November 2010 (6)
  • October 2010 (4)
  • September 2010 (4)
  • August 2010 (6)
  • July 2010 (8)
See All

Recent Posts

Industries

  • Service Providers
  • Utilities and Strategic Industries
  • Data Center
  • Research and Education Network

Products

  • Elastic Services Platform
  • Transport Product Lines
  • Management
  • Muse™ - Network and Service Applications
  • Muse™ - Cyber Security Suite
  • Mercury™ - NFV Solutions

Services

  • Professional Services
  • Services Login

Partners

  • Partner Program
  • Partner Login

RESOURCES

  • What's Hot
  • What's New
  • In the News
  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Webinars
  • Innovation

About

  • Exec Team
  • Global Offices
  • Association
  • Corporate Responsibility
  • Contact
  • We're Hiring!
  • Privacy
  • Terms
© All rights reserved ECI Telecom 2018